Chapter 6.2
Distance from the national vote, 1868 to 2024
The share of two-party votes cast in counties at least 20 points from the national margin rose from 25.5% in 1976 to 56.5% in 2024.
DraftFigures and numbers may change as the analysis is rebuilt.what is still being checked
County boundaries are not harmonized across elections. Fixed panels of counties and a state aggregate check the result, but a boundary-consistent rerun is not yet done.
In 2024, 56.5%56.5% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandshare of two-party votes cast in counties 20 or more points from the national marginn3,113Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod2024SourceCounty election returns of the two-party votes for president were cast in counties whose two-party marginCounty two-party marginThe Democratic vote minus the Republican vote, divided by the sum of the two, so a positive value is a Democratic lead. Votes for other candidates are left out. differed from the national margin by 2020 percentage points of two-party marginEstimanddistance from the national margin that makes a county farWeightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod1868-2024SourceCounty election returns pointsPercentage pointThe unit for the difference between two percentages. A change from one share to another is stated in points, not in percent, so that absolute and relative change are not confused. or more, toward either party. In 1976 the share was 25.5%25.5% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandshare of two-party votes cast in counties 20 or more points from the national marginn3,113Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod1976SourceCounty election returns, the lowest in any presidential election from 1868 to 2024. The margin is the gap between the two parties' shares of the votes they split between them, and this chapter calls a county that far from the national margin a far county. Measuring distance from the nation rather than from an even split keeps a national landslide from reading as a geographic one. Against an even split, the median county's margin, whichever party won it, was 14.414.4 points of two-party marginEstimandmedian over counties of the absolute county two-party marginWeightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod1976SourceCounty election returnsNoteRaw basis: the county's own margin, not its margin relative to the nation; each county counts once. points in 1976 and 43.943.9 points of two-party marginEstimandmedian over counties of the absolute county two-party marginWeightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod2024SourceCounty election returnsNoteRaw basis: the county's own margin, not its margin relative to the nation; each county counts once. points in 2024, so the median county's own result was also more lopsided in 2024.
Far from the nation, in 1976 and in 2024
The far county is this chapter's version of the landslide county, and it differs from an ordinary landslide county, whose own winning margin is lopsided. When the nation itself splits unevenly, a county at the national margin is lopsided and is not far, and a county far from the nation can have a close contest of its own. The chapter counts the two-party votes cast in far counties as a share of all two-party votes in the election.
The rise from the 1976 low to the 2024 share came between 1976 and 2016, and it has not continued since; outside the third-party years, 2016, 2020 and 2024 hold the three highest shares in the record. The map shows where the far counties of 2024 are, and the slider takes it back to 1976.
Figure 1
In 2024, 79.1% of counties were 20 or more points from the national margin, against 37.3% in 1976
County two-party margin minus the national two-party margin of the same election, percentage points (positive is more Democratic than the nation), seven presidential elections from 1876 to 2024
Loading county values
County margin minus national margin, points (negative is more Republican, positive is more Democratic)
More RepublicanMore Democratic
Values outside −60 to +60 take the end colors.
No data (3,143 counties)
Select a class to show only those places.
Hover or tap a county for its value, or search by name. Zoom with the buttons on the map, then drag to move it.
- Alaska draws as no data. Its election returns are reported by election district, and the district codes cannot be matched to boroughs and census areas.
Most of the map is in the two darkest shades of red or blue, the far counties, which in 2024 are 79%79.1% percent of countiesEstimandshare of counties 20 or more points from the national marginn3,113Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod2024SourceCounty election returns of all counties. Move the slider back to 1976, when 37%37.3% percent of countiesEstimandshare of counties 20 or more points from the national marginn3,113Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod1976SourceCounty election returns of counties were far and most counties in the Northeast, Midwest and West were not. Red counties were more Republican than the nation and blue counties more Democratic, whatever the winner of the county. By count the far counties of 2024 lean Republican, and by votes they divide evenly between the parties, so area on the map overstates the votes of far Republican counties. Values in Table 4.
Full counts, with no sampling error
These are counted votes, not survey estimates. The returns cover every county with a usable two-party return in each presidential election from 1868 to 2024. They come from the Algara and Amlani county file for 1868 to 2020 [1] and from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab for 2024. Alaska is left out, and the District of Columbia enters in 1964. A full count has no sampling error, so the chapter's shares and counts carry no intervals. A difference between two of them comes from the definitions and the set of counties rather than from chance. The qualification that matters is the county itself. Counties are as reported in each election and their boundaries are not harmonized, and a county's margin records where votes were cast and not who cast them. The report gives every estimate with its interval and sample size.
The rise is measured from a trough
The far county is not new. Figure 2 follows the share of votes cast in far counties through every election since 1868. The share was 48%48.1% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandshare of two-party votes cast in counties 20 or more points from the national marginn2,723Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod1904SourceCounty election returns in 1904, in the years of the Solid South. The highest value in the whole series belongs to 1924, a third-party year, when the two-party margin leaves the third-party votes out and the share describes the two major parties' voters only. From 1928 to 1972 the elections that are not third-party years all sit above the 1976 value. The low of 1976 is a trough below the run of elections before it, and the rise to 2016 is measured from that trough. Even so, 2024, the lowest of the three shares since 2016, lies above the top of the 1928 to 1972 range.
From one far region to every region
The former Confederacy, the states that seceded and were readmitted after the Civil War, stood apart from the rest of the country until 1944. Figure 3 gives the share of each region's own votes cast in far counties, measured against the national margin of the election and not the region's own. In every election from 1892 through 1944 except 1928, at least 67%67.0% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandlowest share of the region's votes cast in far countiesWeightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties in the former Confederacy (AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, TX, VA), Alaska excludedPeriod1892-1944 except 1928SourceCounty election returns of the former Confederacy's votes were cast in far counties. In 1904 the share was 86%86.3% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandshare of the region's two-party votes cast in counties 20 or more points from the national marginn1,000Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties in the former Confederacy (AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, TX, VA), Alaska excludedPeriod1904SourceCounty election returns, with the region's far counties on the Democratic side of the nation. That is the Solid South, the one-party region whose politics Key described [2].
After 1944 the Southern share fell. It was 58%58.0% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandshare of the region's two-party votes cast in counties 20 or more points from the national marginn1,142Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties in the former Confederacy (AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, TX, VA), Alaska excludedPeriod2024SourceCounty election returns in 2024, below its 1904 level, and its far counties now lean the other way, toward the Republican side of the nation. The rest of the country reached 56%55.7% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandshare of the region's two-party votes cast in counties 20 or more points from the national marginn1,971Weightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties outside the former Confederacy, Alaska excludedPeriod2024SourceCounty election returns in 2024. In the five-region view, every region is above 50%50% percent of the election's two-party votesEstimandshare of a region's votes that marks a majorityWeightsnone (full counts)Populationcounties with two-party returns, Alaska excludedPeriod1868-2024SourceCounty election returns in 2024, from the Northeast at the bottom to Other South, the rest of the Census South, at the top; in 1904 only the South was.
Figure 3
The former Confederacy fell from 86.3% of its votes in far counties in 1904 to 58.0% in 2024, and the rest of the country rose to 55.7%
Share of a region's two-party votes cast in counties at least 20 points from the national margin, percent, presidential elections 1868 to 2024
Share of the region's votes in far counties (%)
Show data
| View | Election | Region | Share of region's votes in far counties (%) | Region's share of national votes (%) | Counties | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two groups | 1868 | Confederacy | 63.1 | 14.5 | 485 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1868 | Confederacy | 63.1 | 14.5 | 485 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1868 | Other South | 75.4 | 6.0 | 190 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1868 | Northeast | 38.6 | 38.6 | 214 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1868 | Midwest | 34.8 | 38.4 | 725 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1868 | West | 13.2 | 2.5 | 82 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1868 | Rest of US | 38.8 | 85.5 | 1,211 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1872 | Confederacy | 58.0 | 22.2 | 871 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1872 | Confederacy | 58.0 | 22.2 | 871 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1872 | Other South | 51.6 | 7.2 | 194 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1872 | Northeast | 37.2 | 33.3 | 214 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1872 | Midwest | 57.2 | 35.3 | 797 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1872 | West | 79.8 | 2.0 | 84 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1872 | Rest of US | 48.7 | 77.8 | 1,289 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1876 | Confederacy | 59.3 | 21.5 | 901 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1876 | Confederacy | 59.3 | 21.5 | 901 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1876 | Other South | 31.3 | 7.2 | 197 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1876 | Northeast | 29.4 | 31.8 | 214 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1876 | Midwest | 36.0 | 37.1 | 829 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1876 | West | 17.3 | 2.5 | 89 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1876 | Rest of US | 32.3 | 78.5 | 1,329 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1880 | Confederacy | 61.0 | 19.0 | 918 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1880 | Confederacy | 61.0 | 19.0 | 918 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1880 | Other South | 27.6 | 6.8 | 188 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1880 | Northeast | 28.5 | 32.8 | 215 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1880 | Midwest | 39.1 | 38.4 | 850 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1880 | West | 10.6 | 3.1 | 120 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1880 | Rest of US | 32.8 | 81.0 | 1,373 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1884 | Confederacy | 57.0 | 19.4 | 945 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1884 | Confederacy | 57.0 | 19.4 | 945 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1884 | Other South | 23.9 | 7.0 | 199 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1884 | Northeast | 18.8 | 30.2 | 215 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1884 | Midwest | 29.5 | 40.1 | 862 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1884 | West | 15.3 | 3.3 | 130 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1884 | Rest of US | 24.4 | 80.6 | 1,406 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1888 | Confederacy | 59.0 | 18.2 | 969 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1888 | Confederacy | 59.0 | 18.2 | 969 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1888 | Other South | 19.6 | 7.4 | 200 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1888 | Northeast | 19.2 | 30.2 | 212 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1888 | Midwest | 27.9 | 40.5 | 911 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1888 | West | 15.5 | 3.7 | 137 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1888 | Rest of US | 23.4 | 81.8 | 1,460 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1892 | Confederacy | 70.8 | 16.0 | 999 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1892 | Confederacy | 70.8 | 16.0 | 999 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1892 | Other South | 19.4 | 7.5 | 200 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1892 | Northeast | 26.0 | 31.6 | 215 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1892 | Midwest | 27.5 | 40.8 | 1,012 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1892 | West | 29.6 | 4.1 | 232 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1892 | Rest of US | 26.3 | 84.0 | 1,659 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1896 | Confederacy | 67.0 | 15.7 | 1,006 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1896 | Confederacy | 67.0 | 15.7 | 1,006 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1896 | Other South | 22.8 | 7.7 | 201 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1896 | Northeast | 47.6 | 28.0 | 213 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1896 | Midwest | 28.2 | 42.3 | 1,018 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1896 | West | 56.8 | 6.3 | 277 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1896 | Rest of US | 36.3 | 84.3 | 1,709 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1900 | Confederacy | 69.0 | 13.1 | 994 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1900 | Confederacy | 69.0 | 13.1 | 994 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1900 | Other South | 22.0 | 8.0 | 201 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1900 | Northeast | 31.1 | 28.7 | 216 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1900 | Midwest | 25.7 | 43.3 | 1,018 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1900 | West | 29.9 | 6.9 | 282 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1900 | Rest of US | 27.5 | 86.9 | 1,717 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1904 | Confederacy | 86.3 | 10.2 | 1,000 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1904 | Confederacy | 86.3 | 10.2 | 1,000 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1904 | Other South | 61.7 | 7.9 | 201 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1904 | Northeast | 37.5 | 31.5 | 216 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1904 | Midwest | 44.5 | 42.5 | 1,020 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1904 | West | 46.8 | 7.8 | 286 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1904 | Rest of US | 43.7 | 89.8 | 1,723 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1908 | Confederacy | 75.8 | 10.8 | 1,045 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1908 | Confederacy | 75.8 | 10.8 | 1,045 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1908 | Other South | 29.5 | 8.8 | 276 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1908 | Northeast | 33.5 | 29.1 | 216 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1908 | Midwest | 23.5 | 43.0 | 1,027 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1908 | West | 27.4 | 8.3 | 292 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1908 | Rest of US | 27.7 | 89.2 | 1,811 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1912 | Confederacy | 81.4 | 12.5 | 1,078 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1912 | Confederacy | 81.4 | 12.5 | 1,078 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1912 | Other South | 47.3 | 10.1 | 279 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1912 | Northeast | 51.2 | 28.3 | 216 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1912 | Midwest | 36.6 | 39.8 | 1,043 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1912 | West | 63.9 | 9.3 | 327 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1912 | Rest of US | 45.4 | 87.5 | 1,865 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1916 | Confederacy | 79.2 | 10.1 | 1,100 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1916 | Confederacy | 79.2 | 10.1 | 1,100 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1916 | Other South | 23.6 | 8.2 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1916 | Northeast | 31.5 | 24.9 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1916 | Midwest | 20.7 | 43.1 | 1,049 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1916 | West | 22.4 | 13.7 | 377 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1916 | Rest of US | 24.2 | 89.9 | 1,922 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1920 | Confederacy | 84.4 | 10.0 | 1,105 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1920 | Confederacy | 84.4 | 10.0 | 1,105 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1920 | Other South | 42.1 | 10.2 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1920 | Northeast | 28.8 | 28.1 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1920 | Midwest | 46.8 | 42.5 | 1,051 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1920 | West | 35.4 | 9.2 | 402 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1920 | Rest of US | 39.4 | 90.0 | 1,949 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1924 | Confederacy | 94.1 | 9.9 | 1,126 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1924 | Confederacy | 94.1 | 9.9 | 1,126 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1924 | Other South | 77.0 | 9.6 | 279 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1924 | Northeast | 44.6 | 31.0 | 217 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1924 | Midwest | 61.4 | 40.6 | 1,056 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1924 | West | 65.4 | 8.8 | 405 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1924 | Rest of US | 57.7 | 90.1 | 1,957 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1928 | Confederacy | 52.9 | 9.1 | 1,134 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1928 | Confederacy | 52.9 | 9.1 | 1,134 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1928 | Other South | 24.2 | 8.4 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1928 | Northeast | 46.7 | 32.4 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1928 | Midwest | 33.1 | 39.7 | 1,057 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1928 | West | 37.9 | 10.4 | 410 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1928 | Rest of US | 37.6 | 90.9 | 1,963 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1932 | Confederacy | 81.4 | 9.7 | 1,133 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1932 | Confederacy | 81.4 | 9.7 | 1,133 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1932 | Other South | 30.9 | 8.4 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1932 | Northeast | 69.3 | 30.4 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1932 | Midwest | 20.2 | 39.9 | 1,057 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1932 | West | 11.7 | 11.6 | 410 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1932 | Rest of US | 36.6 | 90.3 | 1,963 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1936 | Confederacy | 80.6 | 9.4 | 1,133 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1936 | Confederacy | 80.6 | 9.4 | 1,133 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1936 | Other South | 20.5 | 8.0 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1936 | Northeast | 51.3 | 32.3 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1936 | Midwest | 27.1 | 38.7 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1936 | West | 25.1 | 11.7 | 410 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1936 | Rest of US | 34.9 | 90.6 | 1,962 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1940 | Confederacy | 85.0 | 9.6 | 1,132 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1940 | Confederacy | 85.0 | 9.6 | 1,132 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1940 | Other South | 24.9 | 7.0 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1940 | Northeast | 29.8 | 31.9 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1940 | Midwest | 29.8 | 38.8 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1940 | West | 18.0 | 12.7 | 410 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1940 | Rest of US | 27.8 | 90.4 | 1,962 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1944 | Confederacy | 80.6 | 9.7 | 1,133 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1944 | Confederacy | 80.6 | 9.7 | 1,133 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1944 | Other South | 27.8 | 7.0 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1944 | Northeast | 28.4 | 31.6 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1944 | Midwest | 34.5 | 38.1 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1944 | West | 15.0 | 13.6 | 410 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1944 | Rest of US | 28.9 | 90.3 | 1,962 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1948 | Confederacy | 62.8 | 9.0 | 1,134 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1948 | Confederacy | 62.8 | 9.0 | 1,134 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1948 | Other South | 34.7 | 7.0 | 279 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1948 | Northeast | 31.3 | 31.9 | 217 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1948 | Midwest | 23.3 | 37.2 | 1,056 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1948 | West | 12.7 | 14.9 | 410 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1948 | Rest of US | 25.2 | 91.0 | 1,962 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1952 | Confederacy | 44.9 | 13.8 | 1,135 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1952 | Confederacy | 44.9 | 13.8 | 1,135 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1952 | Other South | 29.8 | 6.4 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1952 | Northeast | 45.9 | 30.1 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1952 | Midwest | 36.7 | 34.7 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1952 | West | 14.3 | 15.0 | 411 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1952 | Rest of US | 35.5 | 86.2 | 1,963 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1956 | Confederacy | 42.2 | 13.5 | 1,138 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1956 | Confederacy | 42.2 | 13.5 | 1,138 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1956 | Other South | 27.7 | 6.2 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1956 | Northeast | 49.0 | 30.4 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1956 | Midwest | 26.0 | 34.2 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1956 | West | 8.1 | 15.6 | 411 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1956 | Rest of US | 31.0 | 86.5 | 1,962 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1960 | Confederacy | 42.3 | 14.5 | 1,139 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1960 | Confederacy | 42.3 | 14.5 | 1,139 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1960 | Other South | 36.0 | 6.0 | 279 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1960 | Northeast | 38.2 | 29.3 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1960 | Midwest | 35.2 | 33.6 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1960 | West | 9.2 | 16.6 | 415 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1960 | Rest of US | 31.2 | 85.5 | 1,966 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1964 | Confederacy | 50.3 | 17.5 | 1,139 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1964 | Confederacy | 50.3 | 17.5 | 1,139 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1964 | Other South | 35.3 | 6.1 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1964 | Northeast | 41.2 | 27.8 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1964 | Midwest | 22.9 | 31.5 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1964 | West | 17.1 | 17.2 | 415 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1964 | Rest of US | 28.8 | 82.5 | 1,968 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1968 | Confederacy | 45.8 | 16.1 | 1,143 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1968 | Confederacy | 45.8 | 16.1 | 1,143 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1968 | Other South | 39.9 | 5.9 | 280 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1968 | Northeast | 42.4 | 27.9 | 217 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1968 | Midwest | 34.1 | 31.8 | 1,056 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1968 | West | 26.0 | 18.3 | 415 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1968 | Rest of US | 35.5 | 83.9 | 1,968 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1972 | Confederacy | 46.5 | 19.9 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1972 | Confederacy | 46.5 | 19.9 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1972 | Other South | 35.9 | 6.0 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1972 | Northeast | 32.4 | 25.9 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1972 | Midwest | 27.2 | 30.0 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1972 | West | 19.9 | 18.2 | 415 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1972 | Rest of US | 27.9 | 80.1 | 1,968 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1976 | Confederacy | 29.6 | 22.7 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1976 | Confederacy | 29.6 | 22.7 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1976 | Other South | 31.2 | 6.0 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1976 | Northeast | 25.3 | 24.0 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1976 | Midwest | 25.4 | 29.6 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1976 | West | 18.8 | 17.6 | 415 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1976 | Rest of US | 24.3 | 77.3 | 1,968 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1980 | Confederacy | 29.5 | 25.0 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1980 | Confederacy | 29.5 | 25.0 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1980 | Other South | 40.9 | 6.1 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1980 | Northeast | 26.3 | 21.7 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1980 | Midwest | 37.5 | 29.2 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1980 | West | 40.1 | 18.0 | 415 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1980 | Rest of US | 35.2 | 75.0 | 1,967 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1984 | Confederacy | 32.6 | 25.3 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1984 | Confederacy | 32.6 | 25.3 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1984 | Other South | 40.6 | 6.0 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1984 | Northeast | 35.3 | 22.2 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1984 | Midwest | 41.6 | 27.5 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1984 | West | 31.4 | 19.0 | 417 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1984 | Rest of US | 37.1 | 74.7 | 1,969 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1988 | Confederacy | 35.2 | 25.5 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1988 | Confederacy | 35.2 | 25.5 | 1,145 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1988 | Other South | 42.7 | 5.8 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1988 | Northeast | 34.1 | 21.7 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1988 | Midwest | 41.3 | 27.0 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 1988 | West | 28.8 | 19.9 | 417 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1988 | Rest of US | 36.0 | 74.5 | 1,969 | n/a |
| Two groups | 1992 | Confederacy | 35.2 | 27.5 | 1,145 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1992 | Confederacy | 35.2 | 27.5 | 1,145 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1992 | Other South | 42.1 | 6.0 | 280 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1992 | Northeast | 34.0 | 20.8 | 217 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1992 | Midwest | 41.3 | 26.2 | 1,055 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1992 | West | 43.7 | 19.5 | 418 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1992 | Rest of US | 39.9 | 72.5 | 1,970 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1996 | Confederacy | 35.2 | 28.1 | 1,144 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1996 | Confederacy | 35.2 | 28.1 | 1,144 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1996 | Other South | 39.3 | 5.7 | 280 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1996 | Northeast | 37.1 | 20.2 | 217 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1996 | Midwest | 37.9 | 25.7 | 1,055 | Third-party year |
| Five regions | 1996 | West | 42.1 | 20.3 | 418 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 1996 | Rest of US | 39.0 | 71.9 | 1,970 | Third-party year |
| Two groups | 2000 | Confederacy | 43.8 | 28.4 | 1,144 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2000 | Confederacy | 43.8 | 28.4 | 1,144 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2000 | Other South | 54.5 | 5.8 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2000 | Northeast | 43.3 | 19.8 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2000 | Midwest | 43.2 | 25.7 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2000 | West | 49.3 | 20.3 | 418 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2000 | Rest of US | 45.9 | 71.6 | 1,970 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2004 | Confederacy | 49.2 | 28.9 | 1,143 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2004 | Confederacy | 49.2 | 28.9 | 1,143 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2004 | Other South | 60.2 | 5.8 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2004 | Northeast | 39.7 | 19.2 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2004 | Midwest | 44.2 | 25.4 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2004 | West | 49.8 | 20.8 | 419 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2004 | Rest of US | 45.9 | 71.1 | 1,971 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2008 | Confederacy | 52.3 | 30.2 | 1,143 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2008 | Confederacy | 52.3 | 30.2 | 1,143 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2008 | Other South | 68.3 | 5.6 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2008 | Northeast | 37.3 | 18.7 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2008 | Midwest | 43.2 | 24.5 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2008 | West | 48.4 | 21.0 | 419 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2008 | Rest of US | 45.2 | 69.8 | 1,971 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2012 | Confederacy | 53.9 | 30.9 | 1,143 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2012 | Confederacy | 53.9 | 30.9 | 1,143 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2012 | Other South | 71.9 | 5.6 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2012 | Northeast | 43.0 | 18.2 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2012 | Midwest | 46.9 | 24.2 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2012 | West | 50.5 | 21.1 | 419 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2012 | Rest of US | 49.0 | 69.1 | 1,971 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2016 | Confederacy | 65.0 | 31.8 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2016 | Confederacy | 65.0 | 31.8 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2016 | Other South | 75.9 | 5.7 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2016 | Northeast | 49.8 | 18.1 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2016 | Midwest | 60.5 | 23.3 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2016 | West | 50.6 | 21.1 | 419 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2016 | Rest of US | 55.9 | 68.2 | 1,971 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2020 | Confederacy | 59.6 | 31.7 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2020 | Confederacy | 59.6 | 31.7 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2020 | Other South | 74.1 | 5.3 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2020 | Northeast | 50.5 | 17.8 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2020 | Midwest | 58.4 | 22.1 | 1,055 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2020 | West | 51.3 | 23.1 | 419 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2020 | Rest of US | 55.1 | 68.3 | 1,971 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2024 | Confederacy | 58.0 | 32.5 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2024 | Confederacy | 58.0 | 32.5 | 1,142 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2024 | Other South | 70.1 | 5.3 | 280 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2024 | Northeast | 52.5 | 17.7 | 217 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2024 | Midwest | 56.5 | 22.2 | 1,056 | n/a |
| Five regions | 2024 | West | 54.1 | 22.2 | 418 | n/a |
| Two groups | 2024 | Rest of US | 55.7 | 67.5 | 1,971 | n/a |
The Confederacy line sits far above the line for the rest of the country from 1892 to 1944, apart from 1928, falls after 1944 and runs nearly level from 1976 to 1996. The line for the rest of the country rises after 1976, and the two lines end in 2024 close to each other. The second view splits the country into five regions. Values in Table 3.
What the far share measures, and what it does not
The far share measures how far counties sit from the nation in one election. Distance from the nation differs from competitiveness, and how close a county's own contest was is better read from its own margin, like the medians that open this essay. The spread could also come from the counties themselves. The number of counties in the returns rose between 1868 and 2024, and smaller units could spread margins more by construction. A fixed panel of counties that report in every election from 1868 has its low in 1976, tied with 1916, and its three highest shares outside the third-party years in 2016, 2020 and 2024 (Table 7). The spread of state margins around the national margin, measured on units that are the same in 1976 and 2024, rose as well. The two checks reduce the concern about unit size and do not remove it. What the returns do not say is why the share rose. Hopkins argues that American political behavior has nationalized [3], and Rodden traces an urban-rural divide in partisan geography [4]. Bishop and Cushing read the growth of landslide counties as people moving to places that share their politics [5], an account of party sortingParty sortingThe alignment of party with other traits, such as ideology, religion, race and place, so that people who share a party also tend to share those traits. by place that Abrams and Fiorina dispute [6]. County returns record where votes were cast and not who cast them, who moved or why, so they cannot rank these accounts.
What these returns cannot tell you
Returns record where votes were cast, and a far county can hold voters of both parties in large numbers. The returns cannot tell voters who changed their choice from people who started or stopped voting or moved in or out, a limit known as ecological inferenceEcological inferenceDrawing a conclusion about individuals from data on groups or places, such as counties. A pattern across counties can differ from the pattern among the people who live in them.. They count votes and not residents, so in the former Confederacy, where the franchise was restricted for much of the period before the Voting Rights Act, the shares describe who voted, not the adult population. The series ends with 2024 and makes no forecast, and the returns cannot say whether the plateau since 2016 will hold.
Go deeper
- The report: every estimate with its interval and sample size.
- Tables: every figure of the report as a table.
- Elections, 1976 to 2024: the explorer for this part.
Reading paths that include this chapter:
Data sources
- County election returnsCounty presidential returns, 1868-2024: Algara and Amlani (1868-2020) and MIT Election Data and Science Lab (2024), repaired fileYears: President 1868-2024 (40 elections); House and Senate 1990-2024 · Weights: none (full counts); shares of votes weight each county by its two-party votes, shares of counties count each county once · License: The Heideman file is CC BY 4.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22976553), but the state records behind it keep their own terms, and the sites of Florida, Indiana, Colorado and Wisconsin restrict reuse.
References
- Amlani, Sharif; Algara, Carlos (2021). Partisanship & Nationalization in American Elections: Evidence from Presidential, Senatorial, & Gubernatorial Elections in the U.S. Counties, 1872-2020. Electoral Studies 73: 102387. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102387
- Key, V. O., Jr., with the assistance of Alexander Heard (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. Alfred A. Knopf.
- Hopkins, Daniel J. (2018). The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. University of Chicago Press.
- Rodden, Jonathan A. (2019). Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. Basic Books.
- Bishop, Bill, with Robert G. Cushing (2008). The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Houghton Mifflin.
- Abrams, Samuel J.; Fiorina, Morris P. (2012). “The Big Sort” That Wasn’t: A Skeptical Reexamination. PS: Political Science & Politics 45(2): 203-210. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000017
How to cite
@misc{singh2026thelandslidecounty,
author = {Singh, Vishal},
title = {Distance from the national vote, 1868 to 2024},
year = {2026},
url = {https://vishalsingh.org/politics/the-landslide-county},
note = {In The Public Mind. Published 30 September 2026.}
}